Finnish Firms Achieve Tactical Radio and Counter-Drone Coexistence Through Joint Testing

Bittium and Sensofusion confirmed their systems can operate simultaneously without mutual interference, addressing a friction point in European counter-UAS deployments.

Key Facts

- Bittium's Tough SDR tactical radios and Sensofusion's RF jamming counter-drone systems passed joint coexistence testing

- Collaboration aims to enable tactical communications on contested battlefields while anti-drone jamming remains active

- Both Finnish companies will continue interoperability development to meet future operational requirements

Bittium and Sensofusion announced a collaboration to ensure their tactical communications and counter-drone systems can operate side by side without degrading each other's performance. Joint testing confirmed that Bittium's software-defined Tough SDR radios and TAC WIN backbone network can maintain communications while Sensofusion's RF jamming systems are actively suppressing hostile drones. The Finnish companies framed the partnership as addressing a long-standing friction point: traditional counter-UAS jamming disrupts friendly tactical networks, forcing operators to choose between communications and airspace defence.

This development matters for European defence forces integrating counter-drone capabilities into mobile ground formations. NATO armies are fielding distributed counter-UAS systems at brigade and below, but simultaneous RF jamming and tactical datalink use remains an operational constraint. Bittium's anti-jamming waveforms and Sensofusion's targeted jamming profiles now enable concurrent operation, reducing the trade-off between communications resilience and drone suppression. The collaboration reflects a broader European push for interoperable, software-defined defence systems that can dominate the electromagnetic spectrum without friendly interference.

Forward signal: Expect more European defence contractors to pursue joint testing and waveform coordination as counter-UAS and tactical networks converge in contested EW environments. Counter-argument: If real-world operational tempo reveals latency or coordination failures under multi-threat conditions, operators may revert to time-sliced jamming or accept communications blackouts during counter-drone engagements.

Source: European Security & Defence